F-DPCH (Fractional Dedicated
Physical CHannel) was first defined in
3GPP rel6 and then further enhanced in rel7 to overcome some soft handover
limitations. Once HSDPA is used for the transfer of user data and L3 signalling
(RRC & NAS) it allows the multiplexing of up to 10 users on a single SF 256
code for the purposes of sending TPC (Transmit Power Control) commands in the
downlink.
As shown in the table below, 3GPP define 10 slot formats which effectively move the position of the TPC bits in the slot.
The obvious benefit in using F-DPCH is the savings in
OVSF codes in the DL. Even though the rel99 DPCH uses only a SF256, once the
number of simultaneous users increases (it can easily reach 50-60 users in a
busy cell) the impact is quite substantial as sixteen SF256 are equal to one SF16. So clearly 50-60 SF256 will block a large
portion of SF16 codes that HSDPA requires. With F-DPCH we can multiplex 10 users on one SF256 thus the impact on the OVSF tree is greatly reduced. On top of this there are savings in
DL power and DL noise reduction.
It has always struck me as quite strange then, that
mobile operators did not embrace the usage of F-DPCH sooner. As I recently
discovered though, things are starting to slowly change and F-DPCH is being used
by some operators.
This particular one was Wind in Greece and specifically
in the area of Athens that has been upgraded due to a swap (to Huawei).
As can been seen from the trace below the UE signals to
the RNC its support for F-DPCH in the RRC Connection Request. This allows the
RNC to configure SRB over HSPA and F-DPCH from the RRC Connection Setup message
if the establishment cause is related to a PS session. In this particular
network, this option was not used and the SRB was mapped to DCH channels
initially.
The actual F-DPCH configuration is activated in the
Radio Bearer Setup phase as shown below. At the same time the SRB is also
mapped on HSPA channels as this is a pre-requisite for F-DPCH.
Looking at the IE present we can deduce which slot
format is being used (0 in this case) and which OVSF code is being used (256,17
in this case).
No comments:
Post a Comment